All posts

Blacklist Says Listed, Mail-Tester Says 10/10: Which Deliverability Test to Trust

··4 min read

When deliverability tests contradict each other, it's usually because each one measures a different thing, not because one of them is broken. A blocklist check looks at an IP or a domain on one list. A content tester checks authentication and formatting on one message. A seed test samples placement at a handful of inboxes. Gmail and Microsoft decide placement with their own reputation data, which none of those tools can see. Work out what each result is actually about, then isolate the cause one variable at a time.

A typical forum thread: five domains, bought mailboxes on shared infrastructure, a good first month, then high bounces and spam placement. Domain blocklists are clean, a content tester gives 10/10, but one popular blacklist tool shows UCEPROTECT Level 3. Is the domain burned? The answer depends on reading each test for what it is.

What each test actually measures

Test What it looks at What it can't tell you
IP blocklist lookup Whether one sending IP is on a list Whether Gmail or Microsoft trusts you; the IP may not even be yours
Domain blocklist (Spamhaus DBL and similar) Whether your domain appears in links or senders flagged as abusive Placement at providers that don't use that list
Content or "mail score" tester SPF, DKIM, DMARC, headers and content of one message Your reputation with any mailbox provider
Seed or placement test Where one message landed at a small set of test inboxes Placement for real recipients at real companies
Google Postmaster Tools Google's own view of your domain: spam rate, authentication, compliance Anything outside Gmail
Real bounces and replies What real servers and people did Nothing, if you read the codes

Our posts on seed tests and Postmaster Tools go deeper on each.

The UCEPROTECT Level 3 case

UCEPROTECT's Level 3 policy (read 2 November 2026) says Level 3 "lists IP Space of the worst ASN's", meaning every IP of a whole network once enough of its addresses hit Level 1 in seven days. The same page says Level 3 is for "HARDLINERS", that it "can, and probably will cause collateral damage to innocent users when used to block email", and suggests receivers use it as a few points in a spam score rather than a block.

So a Level 3 hit means your provider's network had abuse, not that you did. If you send through Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, the IP a blacklist tool tested may be one you never used. Check the IP that actually appears in the Received headers of a real message with the IP blacklist check. Our guide to getting off a blacklist covers which lists matter and the published expiry for each.

When every public check is green and placement still drops

This is the harder case, and the useful method is isolation. One sender who saw a whole fleet drop at Google overnight, with every public check green, tested one variable at a time into a separate mailbox provider: a plain sterile email, then the signature alone, then the brand link alone, then the brand name in the body, and so on until one change flipped the result.

  1. Start sterile. A short plain-text message, no links, no signature, from one inbox. If it lands in spam, the problem is the sender (domain, IP or tenant), not the copy.
  2. Add one element at a time. Signature, then tracking, then each link, then the real body. The step that flips placement is your cause.
  3. Compare domains. Send the same sterile message from a suspect domain and from a domain with a clean history, through the same provider.
  4. Repeat. One seed run is noise. Two or three runs over different days are a signal.

Don't skip the list

Bounces and complaints feed the reputation data that no public test shows. A campaign with a 4% bounce rate can push a domain's placement down within weeks, with every blocklist still clean. Before you replace domains:

  1. Export the last campaign's bounces and sort them in the bounce message analyzer. Many 5.1.1 codes mean the list is the cause.
  2. Upload the remaining list on the verify page. Valid, risky and invalid download as separate files.
  3. Resume small, to the valid file only, and watch the codes. Our post on when to retire a cold email domain covers rest-or-replace.

Where SimpleVerifier fits

The blacklist and bounce tools are free. For mailbox checks, the first 100 are free with a Google sign-in on the verify page. Starter is $9 a month for 2,500 checks, and Pro is $39 a month with the first 100,000 checks a month at full speed, then slower, never cut off. See pricing.

Common questions

My domain is on UCEPROTECT Level 3. Is it burned?

Level 3 lists the address space of a whole network, so a listing says your provider's network had a lot of abuse, not that your domain did, and UCEPROTECT itself advises receivers to use it as a score rather than a hard block. If you send through Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, the IP in question is theirs. Check your domain on domain blocklists and your actual placement before deciding anything.

Why does a seed test show spam when every blacklist is clean?

Blocklists are only one input. Gmail and Microsoft use their own reputation data, built from complaints, engagement and bounces, which no public list shows. A seed test is a small sample, so repeat it before acting on one run.

Which deliverability test is most reliable?

For Gmail, Google Postmaster Tools, because it is Google's own data about your domain. For everything else, real replies and bounce codes from real campaigns, then seed tests repeated over several days.

How do I know if the problem is my domains or my inboxes?

Send the same sterile message from one inbox on the suspect domain and one inbox on a domain with a clean history, through the same provider. If only the suspect domain goes to spam, it's the domain. If both do, look at the infrastructure or the copy.

Check your list before you send

Real mailbox checks over SMTP, and nothing is sent to the address. Sign in with Google and your first 100 email checks are free, no card. Plans for bigger lists are on the pricing page.